“When a person asks the question that way—’concrete evidence’—we don’t have anything like that for Jesus,” says L. Michael White, classics professor and director of the Institute for the Study of Antiquity and Christian Origins at the University of Texas at Austin. “We have no archaeological…
walmarts liked this
shortlittlehobbit liked this
bluehospitality liked this
shadowy-antiquarian liked this
mrgreeeen liked this
an-ominous-atheist reblogged this from friendlyatheist and added:
you have it. Very interesting!
onedumbjoke liked this
theydothingsdifferentlythere liked this
-iwilldestroyyou liked this
exeuntcreation answered:
the josephus stuff is highly disputed, just thought i should add that. it’s likely that it was created several centuries later.
uh-finity reblogged this from friendlyatheist
therodentqueen liked this
rene-muffins liked this
sneetches reblogged this from friendlyatheist
leaningonlampposts liked this
bradjunswick liked this
hermione-the-feminist liked this
allosaurusmeat answered:
So the best source they have was written 20 years after he died by someone who heard of him?
saintfactory liked this
voorwaarts liked this
secretlyknownasjonat liked this
feliciaa-mariee reblogged this from friendlyatheist
xx-rapunzel-xx liked this
musichistory liked this
vruz said:
I want to see his birth certificate! How can I know he’s the legitimate Messiah without a birth certificate? besides, everybody knows that Nazareth is not part of the union!
fuckyeahlgbt liked this
scheffxp liked this
scheffxp reblogged this from friendlyatheist
macmankev liked this
sharklauncher liked this
gypsytits liked this
stefansjjacko liked this
partyontheinterstate- liked this
mityelpoc liked this
friendlyatheist posted this
